/ Modified may 20, 2024 4:53 p.m.

Ballot question to remove Douglas AMA is thrown out

Cochise County officials said a lawsuit brought by the EDF forced the decision.

cochise county seal The seal of Cochise County.

This article has been updated as of 9:20 a.m.

The Environmental Defense Action Fund has voluntarily withdrew their lawsuit after Cochise County pulled the initiative aiming to remove the Douglas Active Management Area from the November ballot after multiple errors in the filing process were found.

After EDF Action filed a lawsuit against Cochise County Tuesday for initially approving a citizen initiative that attempts to remove the Douglas Active Management Area (AMA), the county has now found the lawsuit has merit and has removed the initiative from the November ballot.

Cochise County Elections Director Bob Bartelsmeyer confirmed Thursday that he and County Recorder David Stevens met with the Cochise County Attorney and found that the complaint filed by the EDF Action was valid, which cites multiple errors in the petition-filing process and the language presented to voters by the Political Action Committee Save Our Water.

Save Our Water committee is led by McNeal resident Ann Waters.

The EDF Action lawsuit stated that Bartelsmeyer permitted Save Our Water to submit more than 2,100 signatures in separate batches, which is prohibited. The suit claims that the Save Our Water committee first submitted 634 signatures on 52 petition sheets to Bartelsmeyer on July 6, and then, submitted an additional 1,483 signatures on 123 petition sheets a day later. Attorneys claim once a receipt is given for the initial petitions more signatures cannot be added.

The complaint also claimed that the description of the initiative was faulty in its language, assuming a citizen initiative can repeal the Douglas AMA and re-establish the previous Irrigation Non-Expansion Area or INA. But the suit claims there is no legal way for voters to get rid of the AMA. It also says the creation of the AMA dissolved the INA which means there is no INA to put in place and one cannot be created by voters.

According to the lawsuit, each petition circulated by the Save Our Water committee did not require signers to attest that they live within the Douglas Groundwater Basin. All that the petition asks signers to attest to is that they are “a qualified elector of the state of Arizona, county of Cochise.”

The signatures submitted by Save Our Water committee were initially approved on July 13. In the 2022 general election, 52.52% of voters within the Douglas Groundwater Basin voted “Yes” for the Douglas AMA and 44.14% voted "No."

This article has been updated to display the correct name of the Environmental Defense Action Fund.

By posting comments, you agree to our
AZPM encourages comments, but comments that contain profanity, unrelated information, threats, libel, defamatory statements, obscenities, pornography or that violate the law are not allowed. Comments that promote commercial products or services are not allowed. Comments in violation of this policy will be removed. Continued posting of comments that violate this policy will result in the commenter being banned from the site.

By submitting your comments, you hereby give AZPM the right to post your comments and potentially use them in any other form of media operated by this institution.
AZPM is a service of the University of Arizona and our broadcast stations are licensed to the Arizona Board of Regents who hold the trademarks for Arizona Public Media and AZPM. We respectfully acknowledge the University of Arizona is on the land and territories of Indigenous peoples.
The University of Arizona